Skip to main content

The Ointment of Jesus says much about Jesus’ new life after Crucifixion

The Ointment of Jesus says much about Jesus’ new life after Crucifixion

By flibbertigibbet

The ‘Ointment of Jesus’, the balm to cure Jesus’ injuries after he was taken down from the cross is found mentioned in more than a thousand books of medicine. What is more, these books also mention that the ointment was prepared for none other than Jesus Christ. Some of these books were written by the Jews, some by the Christians and some by the Zoroastrians. Hence, the scholarly investigations clearly prove that Jesus escaped death on the cross. If the evangelists set down something contrary to this, their testimony is not to be trusted at all; because, firstly, they were not personally present when the Crucifixion took place. In fact, they had all fled the scene betraying utter lack of faithfulness to Jesus. Secondly, the Gospels themselves are replete with contradictions, so much so that the Gospel of Barnabas
categorically rejects that Jesus was crucified. Thirdly, the same Gospels that are relied upon so heavily also state that Jesus, after the Crucifixion, met his disciples and showed them his injuries. The statement therefore proves that his injuries did last until the time he met his disciples, and that the ointment had to be prepared for his injuries. Hence, we can infer from this that the ointment was prepared for no other purpose but this. Moreover, the Gospels also provide evidence that Jesus secretly moved around within the environs of his town and that it was only after he had recovered by using the ointment that he migrated.
The Christians are faced with a great predicament with regard to what happened to Jesus after he was crucified. I mean the intellectual testimony of the ‘Ointment of Jesus’ which straight away rejects their beliefs and causes the whole edifice of the Atonement and Trinity to fall on its knees.
There has also emerged some more evidence in support of the earlier discoveries. That being the investigations which prove that Jesus, after he escaped the Crucifixion, travelled to India from where he entered Nepal and eventually made to Tibet whereafter he lived in Kashmir for a considerable period of time during which he imparted guidance to the Israelites who had, at the time of the Diaspora, left Babylonia and settled in Kashmir. In the end, he died in Srinagar at the age of 120 and was buried in the district of Khan Yar, where, owing to the common misusage, he later came to be known as Yuz Asaf, the Prophet.
The Buddhist literature provides testimony to Jesus’ coming to India and preaching to different nations. The reason why he came to these countries, as the Buddhist literature mentions he did, is not how the lamas explain it happened. To them he was only an heir to the Buddha’s teaching. In fact, this is quite a mischievous statement. The fact rather is that when God granted Jesus deliverance from the cross, Jesus knew it would be unwise to stay in that country any longer and that he had to migrate at any cost.
Since the Israelites were dispersed as a result of the Nebuchadnezzar aggression and settled in countries like India, Kashmir, Tibet and China, Jesus considered it appropriate to migrate to the same parts. History bears witness that a small minority of the Jews who had migrated to these parts had converted to Buddhism in accordance with their age- old practice.
Hence, while it is established that a minority of the Jews had converted to Buddhism, it was necessary for Jesus to migrate to these countries in order to refute Buddhism and hold meetings with its elders. He, therefore, acted accordingly. It was due to this that Jesus’ life history was recorded by the Buddhists. It seems as if at that time Buddhism was in full swing in these areas and that Veda’s religion was already dead.
The shrine of Jesus in Kashmir which is said to have been standing there for about as many as 1900 years furnishes an excellent proof for this. There were probably some inscriptions also at the shrine, which are now missing.
In the event of the evidence being credible, Christianity is rendered like a roof that is supported by no more than a single beam. No sooner does the beam break up, than the roof collapses.


Popular posts from this blog

If Jesus did not die upon the cross: A study in evidence

The Last Supper This is a small booklet with a very descriptive title, written by an Australian Judge, Ernest Brougham Docker, in 1920. He became a judge of the District Court and chairman of Quarter Sessions for the north-western district in 1881. He retired in 1918 after the passage of the Judges Retirement Act.
He examines the limitations in the so called testimony of the apostles about resurrection in his book. He makes several strong points against resurrection of Jesus, may peace be on him, but one that can be described in a few lines is quoted here:
“He (Jesus) expressed his forebodings to His disciples, I firmly believe; I am equally convinced that He did not predict His rising again. The Conduct of the disciples after crucifixion shows that they had no expectation of a resurrection; and it is altogether incredible that they could have forgotten a prediction so remarkable.”
There are 14 parts of this short booklet by Ernest Brougham Docker, published in 1920. The fifth part concl…

Aloe and Myrrh: modern day analysis of two ancient herbs

By Arif Khan .. Edited by Jonathan Ghaffar
Aloe and Myrrh are mentioned in the Gospel as being present immediately after the body of Hadhrat Isa (Jesus) was tended to by Nicodemus and Joseph of Arimathea; the presence of these medicinal plants has often been explained by Christian scholars as being part of an embalming process, whereas Hadhrat Masih Ma’ud (Mirza Ghulam Ahmad) in his treatise “Masih Hindustan Mein” (“Jesus in India”) described how they were essential ingredients for an ointment applied to Jesus’ wounds. What role do these herbs play today? Can an exploration of their modern day uses throw light on possible events 2000 years ago?The mention of the herbs appears in the Crucifixion story as it is recorded in the Gospel of John:

وفات مسیح پر حضرت ابن عباس ؓ کا عقیدہ

سیدناحضرت ابن عباس رضی اللہ تعالیٰ عنہ سورۃآل عمران کی  آیت نمبر ۵۶

کا ترجمہ کرتے ہوئے فرماتے ہیں ۔ مُمِیْتُکَ ۔یعنی مُتَوَفِّیْکَ کا مطلب ہے میں تجھے موت دینے والا ہوں ۔